![topaz video enhance ai 1.6.0 topaz video enhance ai 1.6.0](http://p6.itc.cn/q_70/images03/20200917/514c2634633e47e5a9a104863cfd7a4d.jpeg)
Of course, the most immediately obvious differences between ACR and NX-i / NX-D are their camera support and price tag. The main differencesĬlick or tap for the full-sized ACR version here for ViewNX-i version
![topaz video enhance ai 1.6.0 topaz video enhance ai 1.6.0](https://pcprogs.net/uploads/posts/2021-04/1617330040_topaz-video-enhance-1.jpg)
For NX-i and NX-D, I saved at JPEG quality 86, producing similarly-sized files. Images processed in ACR were saved at JPEG quality 11, just as used in our galleries. Only Capture NX-D allows corrections to be enabled/disabled (although even it prevents disabling distortion correction for certain lenses). ViewNX-i doesn't allow you to change whether or not distortion correction is enabled, and just abides by what's set in the raw file. To avoid getting too far into the weeds, sharpness and noise reduction were left at their defaults, while lens corrections were enabled for all three apps where possible.Īdobe Camera Raw doesn't allow built-in corrections to be disabled at all. I've chosen images from the Nikon Z6 for use in this comparison, since it's similar in price and resolution to the EOS R used in the first article, and has been around long enough for Adobe to fine-tune its support.Īdobe Camera Raw version 12.4's user interface.
![topaz video enhance ai 1.6.0 topaz video enhance ai 1.6.0](https://discourseupload.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/optimized/3X/d/a/da74489cb70f5d2f4926abfa98e5d18a9608e2f8_2_637x424.png)
To level the playing field as much as possible, I've once again aimed to reproduce the look of already-processed images from our galleries, without any prior knowledge as to the recipes behind them.
Topaz video enhance ai 1.6.0 windows 10#
My computer is a 2018-vintage Dell laptop running Windows 10 version 1909. In this article, I'm comparing Adobe Camera Raw 12.4 alongside Adobe Bridge 10.1.1 versus Nikon ViewNX-i 1.4.3 and Capture NX-D 1.6.3, all of which are their current versions. As in the previous article, I'll be limiting discussion mostly to each application's user interface and image quality in the interests of keeping things to a readable length, and won't be addressing features like image management, tethering or printing.
Topaz video enhance ai 1.6.0 for free#
There's a bit more to discuss this time around, as Nikon offers a choice of two different raw processing apps for free - the somewhat inconsistently-named ViewNX-i and Capture NX-D. Nikon ViewNX-i version 1.4.3's user interface. Now, I'm back with the second in the series, in which we'll take a look at how Adobe's raw processing rivals that offered for free with Nikon's cameras. Recently, I kicked off a new series of articles comparing the software provided by camera manufacturers with one of their most popular third-party alternatives, pitting Canon Digital Photo Professional head-to-head against Adobe Camera Raw.